<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (12) TMI 34 - CESTAT, Ahmedabad</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=219019</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the service tax liability and interest but set aside the penalties under Sections 76 and 77 of the Finance Act, 1994. The appellant&#039;s prompt payment of service tax upon notification by the customer, coupled with active engagement in tax matters, demonstrated no intent to evade tax. Therefore, invoking Section 80 of the Finance Act, 1994, the Tribunal found the penalties unwarranted due to the absence of mens rea for tax evasion.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 12 Sep 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 06 Nov 2012 12:55:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=192389" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (12) TMI 34 - CESTAT, Ahmedabad</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=219019</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the service tax liability and interest but set aside the penalties under Sections 76 and 77 of the Finance Act, 1994. The appellant&#039;s prompt payment of service tax upon notification by the customer, coupled with active engagement in tax matters, demonstrated no intent to evade tax. Therefore, invoking Section 80 of the Finance Act, 1994, the Tribunal found the penalties unwarranted due to the absence of mens rea for tax evasion.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 12 Sep 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=219019</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>