<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (12) TMI 31 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=219016</link>
    <description>Acceptance of compensation under an award as full and final settlement barred the petitioner from later seeking additional payment while retaining the benefit already received. The court found that the receipts and surrounding correspondence did not support any acceptance without prejudice, and the petitioner could not approbate and reprobate to invoke writ jurisdiction for further relief. In these circumstances, the prayer for mandamus against the employer was not maintainable. The challenge to the award was therefore treated as barred by estoppel, waiver, and the doctrine of election, and no further relief was granted.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 17 Oct 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 17 Nov 2012 10:47:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=192386" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (12) TMI 31 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=219016</link>
      <description>Acceptance of compensation under an award as full and final settlement barred the petitioner from later seeking additional payment while retaining the benefit already received. The court found that the receipts and surrounding correspondence did not support any acceptance without prejudice, and the petitioner could not approbate and reprobate to invoke writ jurisdiction for further relief. In these circumstances, the prayer for mandamus against the employer was not maintainable. The challenge to the award was therefore treated as barred by estoppel, waiver, and the doctrine of election, and no further relief was granted.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 17 Oct 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=219016</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>