https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=219015 The Tribunal allowed Cenvat credit for security services and mobile phones, subject to verification and apportionment for dutiable products. Credit for vehicle insurance was permitted based on company ownership and director usage, pending verification and apportionment. Credit for other items was disallowed, and the adjudicating authority was directed to quantify eligible credit based on Tribunal decisions. The appellant was granted another chance to provide records for verification to ensure proper credit quantification. en-us Fri, 17 Aug 2012 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 18 Jan 2013 11:09:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=219015 The Tribunal allowed Cenvat credit for security services and mobile phones, subject to verification and apportionment for dutiable products. Credit for vehicle insurance was permitted based on company ownership and director usage, pending verification and apportionment. Credit for other items was disallowed, and the adjudicating authority was directed to quantify eligible credit based on Tribunal decisions. The appellant was granted another chance to provide records for verification to ensure proper credit quantification. Case-Laws Central Excise Fri, 17 Aug 2012 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=219015