https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=219003 The Tribunal upheld the addition of Rs.35,000 on account of the sale of ornaments, Rs.1,10,240 for alleged unaccounted cash, and Rs.7,55,800 for alleged excess stock. The delay in filing the appeal was not condoned, and the penalty under section 271(1)(c) was confirmed. The appeal in ITA No.1023/Ahd/2009 was partly allowed for statistical purposes, while the appeals in ITA No.1022 and 1330/Ahd/2009 were allowed for statistical purposes. en-us Fri, 20 Jul 2012 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 19 Sep 2012 15:04:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=219003 The Tribunal upheld the addition of Rs.35,000 on account of the sale of ornaments, Rs.1,10,240 for alleged unaccounted cash, and Rs.7,55,800 for alleged excess stock. The delay in filing the appeal was not condoned, and the penalty under section 271(1)(c) was confirmed. The appeal in ITA No.1023/Ahd/2009 was partly allowed for statistical purposes, while the appeals in ITA No.1022 and 1330/Ahd/2009 were allowed for statistical purposes. Case-Laws Income Tax Fri, 20 Jul 2012 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=219003