<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (12) TMI 15 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=219000</link>
    <description>The court dismissed the appeals in quantum proceedings, upholding the disallowance of depreciation on leased assets. However, in penalty proceedings, the appeal was allowed, and the penalty under Section 271(1)(c) was deleted.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 20 Jul 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 19 Sep 2012 14:18:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=192370" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (12) TMI 15 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=219000</link>
      <description>The court dismissed the appeals in quantum proceedings, upholding the disallowance of depreciation on leased assets. However, in penalty proceedings, the appeal was allowed, and the penalty under Section 271(1)(c) was deleted.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 20 Jul 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=219000</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>