https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=218977 The appeal against Order-in-Appeal No. OIA No. Comm r(A)/71/VDR-I/2011 was rejected, affirming the appellant's liability to pay interest on Central Excise duty for issuing supplementary invoices reflecting increased product prices. The court upheld the original order, citing precedents like SKF India Limited and KEC International, and found no merit in the appellant's arguments. The judgment emphasized the settled legal position and various Tribunal decisions supporting the decision, ultimately dismissing the appeal and requiring the appellant to discharge the interest liability as determined by the revenue authorities. en-us Tue, 21 Feb 2012 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 30 Nov 2012 22:29:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=218977 The appeal against Order-in-Appeal No. OIA No. Comm r(A)/71/VDR-I/2011 was rejected, affirming the appellant's liability to pay interest on Central Excise duty for issuing supplementary invoices reflecting increased product prices. The court upheld the original order, citing precedents like SKF India Limited and KEC International, and found no merit in the appellant's arguments. The judgment emphasized the settled legal position and various Tribunal decisions supporting the decision, ultimately dismissing the appeal and requiring the appellant to discharge the interest liability as determined by the revenue authorities. Case-Laws Central Excise Tue, 21 Feb 2012 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=218977