<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (11) TMI 991 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=218976</link>
    <description>Cenvat credit was allowable where inputs were sent to a job worker under the prescribed challan, duty was paid by the job worker on the processed goods before return, and binding precedent treated that payment as sufficient basis for credit to the manufacturer receiving them back. On that footing, denial of credit was unsustainable and the manufacturer was entitled to avail the credit.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 05 Mar 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 17 Sep 2012 15:45:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=192346" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (11) TMI 991 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=218976</link>
      <description>Cenvat credit was allowable where inputs were sent to a job worker under the prescribed challan, duty was paid by the job worker on the processed goods before return, and binding precedent treated that payment as sufficient basis for credit to the manufacturer receiving them back. On that footing, denial of credit was unsustainable and the manufacturer was entitled to avail the credit.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 05 Mar 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=218976</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>