<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (11) TMI 989 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=218974</link>
    <description>The Tribunal partially allowed the appeal, directing fresh adjudication on specific issues and deletion of certain additions. It emphasized consistency in accounting practices and proper evaluation of international transactions, particularly instructing re-examination of payments to Initiative Media Technologies, Paris, and recalculating commission rates related to transactions with IM Hamburg after excluding certain comparisons.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 09 Nov 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 30 Nov 2012 18:57:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=192344" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (11) TMI 989 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=218974</link>
      <description>The Tribunal partially allowed the appeal, directing fresh adjudication on specific issues and deletion of certain additions. It emphasized consistency in accounting practices and proper evaluation of international transactions, particularly instructing re-examination of payments to Initiative Media Technologies, Paris, and recalculating commission rates related to transactions with IM Hamburg after excluding certain comparisons.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 09 Nov 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=218974</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>