<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (11) TMI 987 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=218972</link>
    <description>The High Court upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decision to remand issues concerning the method of accounting and interest accrued on investments to the Assessing Officer for fresh consideration. It was emphasized that no questions of law arose at that stage, and the decision on charging interest would be contingent on resolving the primary issues. The Court clarified that the issue of charging interest was premature until the main issues were addressed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 18 Jan 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 30 Nov 2012 18:21:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=192342" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (11) TMI 987 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=218972</link>
      <description>The High Court upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decision to remand issues concerning the method of accounting and interest accrued on investments to the Assessing Officer for fresh consideration. It was emphasized that no questions of law arose at that stage, and the decision on charging interest would be contingent on resolving the primary issues. The Court clarified that the issue of charging interest was premature until the main issues were addressed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 18 Jan 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=218972</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>