https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=218962 The court dismissed the writ petition, stating that consideration of Ext.P1 application for assessment orders was unnecessary as the orders had already been issued. Additionally, Ext.P4 application for benefit under the Amnesty Scheme was denied due to the petitioner's non-compliance with the scheme's conditions, leading to the revocation of the amnesty facility. The court emphasized that its decision did not prevent authorities from reviewing any future applications meeting eligibility criteria. en-us Wed, 31 Oct 2012 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 29 Nov 2012 14:56:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=218962 The court dismissed the writ petition, stating that consideration of Ext.P1 application for assessment orders was unnecessary as the orders had already been issued. Additionally, Ext.P4 application for benefit under the Amnesty Scheme was denied due to the petitioner's non-compliance with the scheme's conditions, leading to the revocation of the amnesty facility. The court emphasized that its decision did not prevent authorities from reviewing any future applications meeting eligibility criteria. Case-Laws VAT and Sales Tax Wed, 31 Oct 2012 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=218962