<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (11) TMI 975 - CESTAT, BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=218960</link>
    <description>The tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, holding that their activities were more aligned with providing &quot;information technology software service&quot; rather than &quot;supply of manpower.&quot; They found no justification for the denial of CENVAT credit or the demand of service tax under &quot;manpower supply service&quot; for activities outside India. The tribunal waived the pre-deposit of the dues and stayed the recovery until the appeals were disposed of, ultimately allowing both stay applications.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 18 Apr 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 11 Apr 2016 12:33:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=192330" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (11) TMI 975 - CESTAT, BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=218960</link>
      <description>The tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, holding that their activities were more aligned with providing &quot;information technology software service&quot; rather than &quot;supply of manpower.&quot; They found no justification for the denial of CENVAT credit or the demand of service tax under &quot;manpower supply service&quot; for activities outside India. The tribunal waived the pre-deposit of the dues and stayed the recovery until the appeals were disposed of, ultimately allowing both stay applications.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 18 Apr 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=218960</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>