<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (11) TMI 974 - CESTAT, BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=218959</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT, Bangalore, ruled in favor of the appellant, determining that the services provided were more appropriately categorized as &#039;Information Technology Services&#039; rather than &#039;Manpower Recruitment or Supply Agency Services.&#039; The tribunal agreed with the advocate&#039;s arguments regarding the taxability of the services during the disputed periods and granted a waiver of predeposit of dues, staying the recovery of the demanded amount until the appeal&#039;s final disposition.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 15 Dec 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 05 Apr 2016 10:51:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=192329" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (11) TMI 974 - CESTAT, BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=218959</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT, Bangalore, ruled in favor of the appellant, determining that the services provided were more appropriately categorized as &#039;Information Technology Services&#039; rather than &#039;Manpower Recruitment or Supply Agency Services.&#039; The tribunal agreed with the advocate&#039;s arguments regarding the taxability of the services during the disputed periods and granted a waiver of predeposit of dues, staying the recovery of the demanded amount until the appeal&#039;s final disposition.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 15 Dec 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=218959</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>