<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (11) TMI 969 - CESTAT, KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=218954</link>
    <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the Appellant, finding that no duty was demandable on ship stores of Indian origin. The Regulations on imported stores were deemed not applicable to stores of Indian origin. The issue of including freight and insurance charges in the assessable value was not pursued by the Appellant. The impugned order was set aside concerning the duty demand on ship stores of Indian origin, and the appeal was allowed on that specific issue.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 26 Dec 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 25 Sep 2012 18:24:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=192324" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (11) TMI 969 - CESTAT, KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=218954</link>
      <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the Appellant, finding that no duty was demandable on ship stores of Indian origin. The Regulations on imported stores were deemed not applicable to stores of Indian origin. The issue of including freight and insurance charges in the assessable value was not pursued by the Appellant. The impugned order was set aside concerning the duty demand on ship stores of Indian origin, and the appeal was allowed on that specific issue.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 26 Dec 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=218954</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>