<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (11) TMI 958 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=218943</link>
    <description>The Customs, Excise &amp;amp; Service Tax Appellate Tribunal set aside an adjudication order determining duty liability on goods manufactured without payment of duty. The Tribunal remanded the matter for further examination based on additional evidence presented by the assessee. The Settlement Commission rejected the assessee&#039;s application, leading to the original authority passing an order-in-original. The Tribunal allowed the assessee to produce additional material indicating lawful payment of duty, directing the original authority to reassess. The High Court upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decision, affirming its authority to remand for further examination of additional evidence by the adjudicating authority.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 31 May 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 10 Sep 2014 16:12:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=192313" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (11) TMI 958 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=218943</link>
      <description>The Customs, Excise &amp;amp; Service Tax Appellate Tribunal set aside an adjudication order determining duty liability on goods manufactured without payment of duty. The Tribunal remanded the matter for further examination based on additional evidence presented by the assessee. The Settlement Commission rejected the assessee&#039;s application, leading to the original authority passing an order-in-original. The Tribunal allowed the assessee to produce additional material indicating lawful payment of duty, directing the original authority to reassess. The High Court upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decision, affirming its authority to remand for further examination of additional evidence by the adjudicating authority.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 31 May 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=218943</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>