<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (11) TMI 956 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=218941</link>
    <description>Delay in filing the departmental appeal was condoned because the explanation was found sufficient and uncontroverted. The court accepted that the department acts through officials and that such delay could be excused on the facts, but made the condonation conditional upon payment of costs within a fortnight. The matter was directed to be listed for admission hearing, with further orders reserved if the costs were not paid.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 02 May 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 18 Jan 2013 14:42:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=192311" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (11) TMI 956 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=218941</link>
      <description>Delay in filing the departmental appeal was condoned because the explanation was found sufficient and uncontroverted. The court accepted that the department acts through officials and that such delay could be excused on the facts, but made the condonation conditional upon payment of costs within a fortnight. The matter was directed to be listed for admission hearing, with further orders reserved if the costs were not paid.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 02 May 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=218941</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>