https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=218938 In a corruption trap case, prima facie evidence of demand, negotiation, acceptance and receipt of illegal gratification, supported by statements, recovery material and call records, justified refusal of bail. The Court held that Section 6A(1) approval was not required because the matter arose from a trap arrest involving direct evidence, so Section 6A(2) applied. The pleas based on medical condition and parity failed because jail treatment was shown to be adequate, the co-accused's role was not comparable, and the petitioners' positions created a real risk of influencing witnesses. Bail was declined at the pre-trial stage. en-us Wed, 11 Apr 2012 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 29 Nov 2012 11:06:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=218938 In a corruption trap case, prima facie evidence of demand, negotiation, acceptance and receipt of illegal gratification, supported by statements, recovery material and call records, justified refusal of bail. The Court held that Section 6A(1) approval was not required because the matter arose from a trap arrest involving direct evidence, so Section 6A(2) applied. The pleas based on medical condition and parity failed because jail treatment was shown to be adequate, the co-accused's role was not comparable, and the petitioners' positions created a real risk of influencing witnesses. Bail was declined at the pre-trial stage. Case-Laws Central Excise Wed, 11 Apr 2012 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=218938