<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (11) TMI 952 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=218937</link>
    <description>The High Court upheld the Tribunal&#039;s order dismissing the appeal due to non-prosecution and refusal to condone the delay. The Court found the Tribunal&#039;s actions reasonable, emphasizing the absence of a valid appeal under section 35C of the Central Excise Act. Despite arguments on the interpretation of the Act and the need for a substantial question of law, the Court concluded that the appeal lacked merit and jurisdictional issues, leading to its dismissal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 24 May 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 11 Aug 2014 10:12:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=192307" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (11) TMI 952 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=218937</link>
      <description>The High Court upheld the Tribunal&#039;s order dismissing the appeal due to non-prosecution and refusal to condone the delay. The Court found the Tribunal&#039;s actions reasonable, emphasizing the absence of a valid appeal under section 35C of the Central Excise Act. Despite arguments on the interpretation of the Act and the need for a substantial question of law, the Court concluded that the appeal lacked merit and jurisdictional issues, leading to its dismissal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 24 May 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=218937</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>