<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (11) TMI 949 - ITAT HYDERABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=218934</link>
    <description>Additional depreciation on plant and machinery used for standardisation and pasteurisation at milk chilling/processing facilities was denied because such processes were not necessary for manufacturing curd and ghee; the assessee could have produced those products from milk without standardisation/pasteurisation, making the machinery too remote from the eligible manufacturing activity. The claim was therefore rejected on merits. Levy of interest under ss. 234B and 234C was held to be consequential and mandatory; the ground was dismissed. Foreign travel expenditure was partly disallowed since the assessee failed to furnish a business-versus-pleasure bifurcation; the disallowance direction was set aside and the issue remitted to the AO for fresh verification on details to be furnished, partly allowing the appeal for statistical purposes.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 05 Oct 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 05 Jan 2026 12:34:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=192304" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (11) TMI 949 - ITAT HYDERABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=218934</link>
      <description>Additional depreciation on plant and machinery used for standardisation and pasteurisation at milk chilling/processing facilities was denied because such processes were not necessary for manufacturing curd and ghee; the assessee could have produced those products from milk without standardisation/pasteurisation, making the machinery too remote from the eligible manufacturing activity. The claim was therefore rejected on merits. Levy of interest under ss. 234B and 234C was held to be consequential and mandatory; the ground was dismissed. Foreign travel expenditure was partly disallowed since the assessee failed to furnish a business-versus-pleasure bifurcation; the disallowance direction was set aside and the issue remitted to the AO for fresh verification on details to be furnished, partly allowing the appeal for statistical purposes.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 05 Oct 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=218934</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>