<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (11) TMI 937 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=218922</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the penalty imposed under section 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act for Assessment Year 2000-01, based on findings that the expenses claimed were not genuinely related to the assessee&#039;s business but were diverted from sister concerns to reduce tax liability. The Tribunal emphasized the importance of bona fide claims and consequences of incorrect claims, leading to the dismissal of the appeal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 20 Jan 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 29 Nov 2012 08:44:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=192292" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (11) TMI 937 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=218922</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the penalty imposed under section 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act for Assessment Year 2000-01, based on findings that the expenses claimed were not genuinely related to the assessee&#039;s business but were diverted from sister concerns to reduce tax liability. The Tribunal emphasized the importance of bona fide claims and consequences of incorrect claims, leading to the dismissal of the appeal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 20 Jan 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=218922</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>