<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (11) TMI 927 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=218912</link>
    <description>A transfer of the right to use a trade mark for royalty was treated as a deemed sale under the Kerala Value Added Tax Act because the franchise agreements granted commercial use of the mark for consideration. A trade mark was held to be goods for VAT purposes, as intangible property capable of transfer and exploitation falls within the statutory concept of goods. Payment of service tax on the royalty did not displace the independent VAT levy arising from the transfer of the right to use goods. The royalty received for franchise use of the trade mark was therefore liable to VAT, and the tax and penalty challenges failed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 14 Nov 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 01 Aug 2014 12:36:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=192282" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (11) TMI 927 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=218912</link>
      <description>A transfer of the right to use a trade mark for royalty was treated as a deemed sale under the Kerala Value Added Tax Act because the franchise agreements granted commercial use of the mark for consideration. A trade mark was held to be goods for VAT purposes, as intangible property capable of transfer and exploitation falls within the statutory concept of goods. Payment of service tax on the royalty did not displace the independent VAT levy arising from the transfer of the right to use goods. The royalty received for franchise use of the trade mark was therefore liable to VAT, and the tax and penalty challenges failed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 14 Nov 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=218912</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>