<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (11) TMI 923 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=218908</link>
    <description>The court dismissed the application seeking condonation of a 933-day delay in filing a Tax Appeal against the Central Excise and Service Tax Tribunal&#039;s order. The court found the explanation for the delay inadequate, emphasizing that &quot;sufficient cause&quot; should only be liberally construed with valid reasons. Citing legal precedents, the court highlighted that negligence, default, or institutional decisions cannot justify delays. The court concluded that the applicant&#039;s reasons did not meet the standard for condonation, leading to the dismissal of the application and discharge of the rule.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 31 Jul 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 03 Jan 2014 11:37:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=192278" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (11) TMI 923 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=218908</link>
      <description>The court dismissed the application seeking condonation of a 933-day delay in filing a Tax Appeal against the Central Excise and Service Tax Tribunal&#039;s order. The court found the explanation for the delay inadequate, emphasizing that &quot;sufficient cause&quot; should only be liberally construed with valid reasons. Citing legal precedents, the court highlighted that negligence, default, or institutional decisions cannot justify delays. The court concluded that the applicant&#039;s reasons did not meet the standard for condonation, leading to the dismissal of the application and discharge of the rule.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 31 Jul 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=218908</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>