<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (11) TMI 921 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=218906</link>
    <description>The court dismissed the writ petition, stating that the petitioners should have utilized the alternative remedy of appeal under FEMA. The petitioners were given three weeks to file an appeal before the AFTE, with no objection on the ground of limitation permitted. The court also specified that the AFTE could request the complete records from the original authority if needed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 03 Mar 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 26 Nov 2012 11:27:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=192276" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (11) TMI 921 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=218906</link>
      <description>The court dismissed the writ petition, stating that the petitioners should have utilized the alternative remedy of appeal under FEMA. The petitioners were given three weeks to file an appeal before the AFTE, with no objection on the ground of limitation permitted. The court also specified that the AFTE could request the complete records from the original authority if needed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>FEMA</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 03 Mar 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=218906</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>