<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (11) TMI 916 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=218901</link>
    <description>In a suit for specific performance, a prima facie contractual foundation was accepted for interim protection where the alleged agreement showed operative effect through the defendant&#039;s subsequent conduct, and the unstamped nature of the document did not defeat relief at the interim stage. The court also considered the position of a later transferee against the doctrines of bona fide purchase without notice, lis pendens, and equitable protection. On the facts, a prima facie inference of notice justified restraint against further dealings with the property to preserve the suit subject-matter pending trial.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 03 May 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 28 Nov 2012 16:48:39 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=192271" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (11) TMI 916 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=218901</link>
      <description>In a suit for specific performance, a prima facie contractual foundation was accepted for interim protection where the alleged agreement showed operative effect through the defendant&#039;s subsequent conduct, and the unstamped nature of the document did not defeat relief at the interim stage. The court also considered the position of a later transferee against the doctrines of bona fide purchase without notice, lis pendens, and equitable protection. On the facts, a prima facie inference of notice justified restraint against further dealings with the property to preserve the suit subject-matter pending trial.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 03 May 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=218901</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>