https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=218895 The High Court admitted the writ petition filed by the revenue to quash an order by CESTAT regarding Service tax and penalty. CESTAT had granted complete waiver of pre-deposit, citing time-barred payment. The High Court granted an interim stay, delaying appeal consideration. The Tribunal's discretion to waive pre-deposit was upheld, but due to the stay order, the appeal exceeded the 180-day disposal limit. Despite finding no grounds for interference, the High Court remitted the matter back to the Tribunal for disposal within four months. The writ petition was rejected, and the Tribunal was directed to consider the case within the specified period without imposing costs. en-us Sat, 25 Feb 2012 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 18 Mar 2013 15:06:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=218895 The High Court admitted the writ petition filed by the revenue to quash an order by CESTAT regarding Service tax and penalty. CESTAT had granted complete waiver of pre-deposit, citing time-barred payment. The High Court granted an interim stay, delaying appeal consideration. The Tribunal's discretion to waive pre-deposit was upheld, but due to the stay order, the appeal exceeded the 180-day disposal limit. Despite finding no grounds for interference, the High Court remitted the matter back to the Tribunal for disposal within four months. The writ petition was rejected, and the Tribunal was directed to consider the case within the specified period without imposing costs. Case-Laws Central Excise Sat, 25 Feb 2012 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=218895