<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (11) TMI 888 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=218873</link>
    <description>The Court dismissed the revenue&#039;s appeals, affirming that the assessee does not qualify as a credit institution under Sections 2(5A) and 2(5B) of the Interest Tax Act, 1974. Consequently, the assessee is not liable for tax under the Act. The issue of reopening the assessment in ITA No. 1002/2006 was rendered moot due to the main decision. Both appeals were dismissed, and the substantial question of law was answered in favor of the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 29 May 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 16 Nov 2012 12:54:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=192243" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (11) TMI 888 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=218873</link>
      <description>The Court dismissed the revenue&#039;s appeals, affirming that the assessee does not qualify as a credit institution under Sections 2(5A) and 2(5B) of the Interest Tax Act, 1974. Consequently, the assessee is not liable for tax under the Act. The issue of reopening the assessment in ITA No. 1002/2006 was rendered moot due to the main decision. Both appeals were dismissed, and the substantial question of law was answered in favor of the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 29 May 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=218873</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>