<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (11) TMI 887 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=218872</link>
    <description>An employer cannot be treated as an assessee in default, or made liable to interest, for the period during which a subsisting High Court interim order restrained deduction and remittance of tax on perquisites. Once that restraint was vacated, liability operated prospectively, and interest under Section 201(1A) arose only from the date the employer failed to comply after vacation of the interim protection. The objection that employee accommodation was not a taxable concession was treated as a factual issue for the concerned employees to raise in their own assessment proceedings before the Assessing Officer, and it was not entertained on behalf of the employer or the association in these proceedings.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 07 Nov 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 01 Jul 2013 14:56:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=192242" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (11) TMI 887 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=218872</link>
      <description>An employer cannot be treated as an assessee in default, or made liable to interest, for the period during which a subsisting High Court interim order restrained deduction and remittance of tax on perquisites. Once that restraint was vacated, liability operated prospectively, and interest under Section 201(1A) arose only from the date the employer failed to comply after vacation of the interim protection. The objection that employee accommodation was not a taxable concession was treated as a factual issue for the concerned employees to raise in their own assessment proceedings before the Assessing Officer, and it was not entertained on behalf of the employer or the association in these proceedings.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 07 Nov 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=218872</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>