<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (11) TMI 886 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=218871</link>
    <description>The Supreme Court upheld the dismissal of appeals due to the appellant&#039;s failure to deposit the excise duty amount as directed by CESTAT within the specified timeframe. The court emphasized the importance of complying with financial obligations set by the tribunal to proceed with legal remedies. Non-compliance with payment directives resulted in the dismissal of the appeals, showcasing the repercussions of not adhering to court orders in this case.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 27 Aug 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 09 Mar 2013 13:59:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=192241" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (11) TMI 886 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=218871</link>
      <description>The Supreme Court upheld the dismissal of appeals due to the appellant&#039;s failure to deposit the excise duty amount as directed by CESTAT within the specified timeframe. The court emphasized the importance of complying with financial obligations set by the tribunal to proceed with legal remedies. Non-compliance with payment directives resulted in the dismissal of the appeals, showcasing the repercussions of not adhering to court orders in this case.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 27 Aug 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=218871</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>