<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (11) TMI 873 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=218858</link>
    <description>The Tribunal set aside the demand of duty and penalty imposed under Section 11AC of the Central Excise Act due to the appellant&#039;s disclosure of all relevant information in June 2006. The extended period of limitation was deemed unjustified as the appellant had not suppressed any facts to evade duty. Consequently, the appeal was allowed, and the demand of duty and penalty were both overturned.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 13 Nov 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 03 Jan 2014 12:18:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=192228" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (11) TMI 873 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=218858</link>
      <description>The Tribunal set aside the demand of duty and penalty imposed under Section 11AC of the Central Excise Act due to the appellant&#039;s disclosure of all relevant information in June 2006. The extended period of limitation was deemed unjustified as the appellant had not suppressed any facts to evade duty. Consequently, the appeal was allowed, and the demand of duty and penalty were both overturned.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 13 Nov 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=218858</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>