<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (11) TMI 861 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=218846</link>
    <description>The Tribunal directed the Commissioner to conduct de novo adjudication to determine against which unit duty should be confirmed, emphasizing the need to specify the unit. The appellant was granted an opportunity to present their case independently for each aspect. Stay petitions and appeals were disposed of accordingly.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 24 Jan 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 27 Nov 2012 17:26:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=192216" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (11) TMI 861 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=218846</link>
      <description>The Tribunal directed the Commissioner to conduct de novo adjudication to determine against which unit duty should be confirmed, emphasizing the need to specify the unit. The appellant was granted an opportunity to present their case independently for each aspect. Stay petitions and appeals were disposed of accordingly.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 24 Jan 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=218846</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>