<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (11) TMI 850 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=218835</link>
    <description>Capital gains were held taxable where the assessees could not prove delivery of possession in part performance of an earlier agreement. The Court found no reliable material to show that the promoter obtained possession in November 1991 so as to attract section 53A of the Transfer of Property Act and the deeming transfer under section 2(47)(v) of the Income-tax Act. The earlier agreement was not matched by the later power of attorney, while the tripartite arrangement of 27.10.1994 evidenced the effective transfer of the larger undivided share. On that basis, the transaction fell outside section 53A and the gains were assessable in the assessees&#039; hands.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 11 Jun 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 27 Nov 2012 15:52:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=192205" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (11) TMI 850 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=218835</link>
      <description>Capital gains were held taxable where the assessees could not prove delivery of possession in part performance of an earlier agreement. The Court found no reliable material to show that the promoter obtained possession in November 1991 so as to attract section 53A of the Transfer of Property Act and the deeming transfer under section 2(47)(v) of the Income-tax Act. The earlier agreement was not matched by the later power of attorney, while the tripartite arrangement of 27.10.1994 evidenced the effective transfer of the larger undivided share. On that basis, the transaction fell outside section 53A and the gains were assessable in the assessees&#039; hands.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 11 Jun 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=218835</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>