<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (11) TMI 846 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=218831</link>
    <description>The High Court dismissed the tax case appeals, confirming the Tribunal&#039;s order. The court held that the block assessment was not barred by limitation, Explanation 1(iv) to Section 158BE was retrospective, the surcharge under Section 113 was applicable retrospectively, and the interest levied under Section 158BFA(1) was justified. The appeals were dismissed with no costs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 06 Jun 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 27 Nov 2012 16:33:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=192201" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (11) TMI 846 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=218831</link>
      <description>The High Court dismissed the tax case appeals, confirming the Tribunal&#039;s order. The court held that the block assessment was not barred by limitation, Explanation 1(iv) to Section 158BE was retrospective, the surcharge under Section 113 was applicable retrospectively, and the interest levied under Section 158BFA(1) was justified. The appeals were dismissed with no costs.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 06 Jun 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=218831</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>