<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (11) TMI 838 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=218823</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the validity of the assessment reopening under Section 147 due to the assessee&#039;s failure to fully disclose material facts. It directed a reassessment of the annual rental value of properties and remanded the disallowance of expenditure under Section 14A back to the AO for reconsideration in line with judicial precedents. The appeals by the assessee were partly allowed for statistical purposes.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 13 Jan 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 27 Nov 2012 17:12:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=192193" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (11) TMI 838 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=218823</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the validity of the assessment reopening under Section 147 due to the assessee&#039;s failure to fully disclose material facts. It directed a reassessment of the annual rental value of properties and remanded the disallowance of expenditure under Section 14A back to the AO for reconsideration in line with judicial precedents. The appeals by the assessee were partly allowed for statistical purposes.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 13 Jan 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=218823</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>