https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=218816 Anticipatory bail was granted because the allegations rested principally on documentary evidence, the main accused had already been arrested and given regular bail, and neither the State nor the complainant showed any need for custodial interrogation. The Court treated the petitioners' exact role as a matter for trial and found no basis to deny pre-arrest protection on the material placed before it. Interim protection in the connected matter was made absolute. en-us Mon, 21 May 2012 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 26 Nov 2012 11:47:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=218816 Anticipatory bail was granted because the allegations rested principally on documentary evidence, the main accused had already been arrested and given regular bail, and neither the State nor the complainant showed any need for custodial interrogation. The Court treated the petitioners' exact role as a matter for trial and found no basis to deny pre-arrest protection on the material placed before it. Interim protection in the connected matter was made absolute. Case-Laws FEMA Mon, 21 May 2012 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=218816