https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=218807 The Tribunal set aside the penalty imposed on the appellant, highlighting the lack of evidence supporting the allegation of clandestine removal and the importance of corroborative proof. The demand of duty was confirmed as uncontested, emphasizing the distinction between shortages and illicit removal in excise matters. en-us Mon, 23 Jan 2012 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 25 Jul 2012 11:38:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=218807 The Tribunal set aside the penalty imposed on the appellant, highlighting the lack of evidence supporting the allegation of clandestine removal and the importance of corroborative proof. The demand of duty was confirmed as uncontested, emphasizing the distinction between shortages and illicit removal in excise matters. Case-Laws Central Excise Mon, 23 Jan 2012 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=218807