<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (11) TMI 818 - CESTAT, CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=218803</link>
    <description>The appeal is allowed in favor of the appellants. The denial of service tax credit for invoices missing supplier service tax registration numbers is rectified by obtaining certificates with the registration numbers. Service tax credit for CHA services for export of goods and input received by the head office is allowed based on legal precedents.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 20 Jan 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 26 Nov 2012 11:10:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=192173" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (11) TMI 818 - CESTAT, CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=218803</link>
      <description>The appeal is allowed in favor of the appellants. The denial of service tax credit for invoices missing supplier service tax registration numbers is rectified by obtaining certificates with the registration numbers. Service tax credit for CHA services for export of goods and input received by the head office is allowed based on legal precedents.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 20 Jan 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=218803</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>