<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (11) TMI 816 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=218801</link>
    <description>The Tribunal condoned a delay of 140 days in filing the appeal due to non-receipt of the order by the appellant, who had engaged in correspondence with the office of Commissioner (Appeals) to obtain the order. The Tribunal considered the circumstances and accepted the date of communication of the order as 19-7-2011, when it was supplied by the office of Commissioner (Appeals). Consequently, the delay was condoned, and the stay petition was scheduled for a hearing on 7-3-2012.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 20 Jan 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 04 Oct 2012 16:36:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=192171" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (11) TMI 816 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=218801</link>
      <description>The Tribunal condoned a delay of 140 days in filing the appeal due to non-receipt of the order by the appellant, who had engaged in correspondence with the office of Commissioner (Appeals) to obtain the order. The Tribunal considered the circumstances and accepted the date of communication of the order as 19-7-2011, when it was supplied by the office of Commissioner (Appeals). Consequently, the delay was condoned, and the stay petition was scheduled for a hearing on 7-3-2012.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 20 Jan 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=218801</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>