<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (11) TMI 811 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=218796</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the AO&#039;s computation of capital gains, dismissing the CIT(A)&#039;s enhancement. It ruled in favor of the assessee regarding the acquisition cost of shares, disallowance of VSAT charges, technical services penalty charges, and addition on bad debts. The Tribunal confirmed the deletion of disallowances and additions, following precedents and legal interpretations. The revenue&#039;s appeal was dismissed, and the assessee&#039;s appeal was allowed, maintaining the original assessment by the AO.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 27 Jul 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 15 Oct 2012 15:36:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=192166" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (11) TMI 811 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=218796</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the AO&#039;s computation of capital gains, dismissing the CIT(A)&#039;s enhancement. It ruled in favor of the assessee regarding the acquisition cost of shares, disallowance of VSAT charges, technical services penalty charges, and addition on bad debts. The Tribunal confirmed the deletion of disallowances and additions, following precedents and legal interpretations. The revenue&#039;s appeal was dismissed, and the assessee&#039;s appeal was allowed, maintaining the original assessment by the AO.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 27 Jul 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=218796</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>