<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (11) TMI 802 - ITAT PUNE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=218787</link>
    <description>The ITAT Pune ruled in favor of the assessee, setting aside the disallowance of salaries paid to employees deputed from sister concerns under section 40A(2)(b) and section 40(a)(ia) of the Income-tax Act, 1961. The ITAT found the payments were reimbursement for services rendered, with no evidence of tax evasion. Additionally, the ITAT upheld the deletion of the disallowance of interest expenditure under section 36(1)(iii) of the Act, emphasizing the availability of interest-free owned funds and lack of proof of non-business advances.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 26 Jul 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 16 Oct 2012 15:17:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=192157" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (11) TMI 802 - ITAT PUNE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=218787</link>
      <description>The ITAT Pune ruled in favor of the assessee, setting aside the disallowance of salaries paid to employees deputed from sister concerns under section 40A(2)(b) and section 40(a)(ia) of the Income-tax Act, 1961. The ITAT found the payments were reimbursement for services rendered, with no evidence of tax evasion. Additionally, the ITAT upheld the deletion of the disallowance of interest expenditure under section 36(1)(iii) of the Act, emphasizing the availability of interest-free owned funds and lack of proof of non-business advances.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 26 Jul 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=218787</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>