<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (11) TMI 778 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=218763</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, setting aside the impugned order and granting relief to the appellants. It held that the appellant was entitled to re-credit entries in their Cenvat Credit account after repaying the rebate amount, emphasizing the need for a comprehensive resolution of all issues raised before the adjudicating authority. The Tribunal criticized the casual attitude of the original adjudicating authority for not addressing the re-credit request, highlighting the importance of considering all relevant issues in dispute resolution.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 04 Oct 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 May 2013 10:27:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=192134" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (11) TMI 778 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=218763</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, setting aside the impugned order and granting relief to the appellants. It held that the appellant was entitled to re-credit entries in their Cenvat Credit account after repaying the rebate amount, emphasizing the need for a comprehensive resolution of all issues raised before the adjudicating authority. The Tribunal criticized the casual attitude of the original adjudicating authority for not addressing the re-credit request, highlighting the importance of considering all relevant issues in dispute resolution.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 04 Oct 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=218763</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>