<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (11) TMI 768 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=218753</link>
    <description>An EOU remained under bond until a final de-bonding order was issued by the competent authority, so duty demand and recovery proceedings against imported or indigenous capital goods were premature before that stage. The applicable procedure and circulars treated duty liability as arising only on de-bonding, and depreciation was to be considered when duty was later computed. On that basis, the Tribunal granted complete waiver of pre-deposit and stay of recovery pending the appeals.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 28 Dec 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sun, 25 Nov 2012 10:56:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=192124" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (11) TMI 768 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=218753</link>
      <description>An EOU remained under bond until a final de-bonding order was issued by the competent authority, so duty demand and recovery proceedings against imported or indigenous capital goods were premature before that stage. The applicable procedure and circulars treated duty liability as arising only on de-bonding, and depreciation was to be considered when duty was later computed. On that basis, the Tribunal granted complete waiver of pre-deposit and stay of recovery pending the appeals.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 28 Dec 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=218753</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>