<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (11) TMI 753 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=218738</link>
    <description>Addition based on stamp valuation under section 50C could not be sustained without a clear factual finding on when transfer was completed and possession of the immovable property was actually handed over. The agreement to sell and sale deed indicated that possession was to follow execution of the sale deed, and no cogent evidence showed earlier delivery of possession by the assessee. Since capital gains taxation in the relevant year depended on the timing of transfer and possession, the existing findings were vacated and the matter was restored to the first appellate authority for fresh adjudication after examining the contractual terms and legal requirements governing transfer and part performance.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 25 Jan 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 24 Nov 2012 02:08:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=192110" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (11) TMI 753 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=218738</link>
      <description>Addition based on stamp valuation under section 50C could not be sustained without a clear factual finding on when transfer was completed and possession of the immovable property was actually handed over. The agreement to sell and sale deed indicated that possession was to follow execution of the sale deed, and no cogent evidence showed earlier delivery of possession by the assessee. Since capital gains taxation in the relevant year depended on the timing of transfer and possession, the existing findings were vacated and the matter was restored to the first appellate authority for fresh adjudication after examining the contractual terms and legal requirements governing transfer and part performance.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 25 Jan 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=218738</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>