<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (11) TMI 746 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=218731</link>
    <description>The Tribunal partly allowed the Revenue&#039;s appeals, confirming additions based on a 3% profit rate on suppressed sales for the relevant assessment years. The Tribunal rejected arguments for the application of gross profit rate and disallowance of expenditures under section 40A(3) of the Income Tax Act, finding no support for cash payments triggering the provisions.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 20 Jan 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 24 Nov 2012 02:40:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=192103" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (11) TMI 746 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=218731</link>
      <description>The Tribunal partly allowed the Revenue&#039;s appeals, confirming additions based on a 3% profit rate on suppressed sales for the relevant assessment years. The Tribunal rejected arguments for the application of gross profit rate and disallowance of expenditures under section 40A(3) of the Income Tax Act, finding no support for cash payments triggering the provisions.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 20 Jan 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=218731</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>