<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (11) TMI 742 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=218727</link>
    <description>The High Court upheld penalties under Sections 76 and 78 of the Finance Act 1994, emphasizing their distinct nature and applicability even for offenses arising from the same transaction. The Commissioner&#039;s decision to set aside the Section 76 penalty was overturned, clarifying that both penalties can be imposed separately. The judgment underscored the importance of analyzing each offense individually and considering factors like mens rea and evasion with a guilty mind when determining penalty imposition for failure to pay service tax and suppression of taxable value.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 25 Oct 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 23 Nov 2012 21:00:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=192099" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (11) TMI 742 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=218727</link>
      <description>The High Court upheld penalties under Sections 76 and 78 of the Finance Act 1994, emphasizing their distinct nature and applicability even for offenses arising from the same transaction. The Commissioner&#039;s decision to set aside the Section 76 penalty was overturned, clarifying that both penalties can be imposed separately. The judgment underscored the importance of analyzing each offense individually and considering factors like mens rea and evasion with a guilty mind when determining penalty imposition for failure to pay service tax and suppression of taxable value.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 25 Oct 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=218727</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>