https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=218723 A writ petition challenging a compensation order was held ordinarily not maintainable where the special statute provided an efficacious appellate remedy, so the objection based on alternative remedy was rejected. However, the compensation demand could not be enforced without first hearing objections and adjudicating liability, including the disputed responsibility of the principal employer or contractor and whether payment had already been made. The authority was required to conduct the statutory inquiry and record findings before final enforcement, so the matter was remanded for fresh determination of liability after hearing the petitioner. en-us Mon, 19 Mar 2012 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 23 Nov 2012 19:42:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=218723 A writ petition challenging a compensation order was held ordinarily not maintainable where the special statute provided an efficacious appellate remedy, so the objection based on alternative remedy was rejected. However, the compensation demand could not be enforced without first hearing objections and adjudicating liability, including the disputed responsibility of the principal employer or contractor and whether payment had already been made. The authority was required to conduct the statutory inquiry and record findings before final enforcement, so the matter was remanded for fresh determination of liability after hearing the petitioner. Case-Laws Indian Laws Mon, 19 Mar 2012 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=218723