<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (11) TMI 736 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=218721</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal for condonation of delay, considering the circumstances surrounding the non-receipt of the impugned order. The requirement of pre-deposit was waived, and the matter was remanded for fresh adjudication due to the ex parte nature of the original order. The appellant was granted an opportunity to present their case before the adjudicating authority, emphasizing the need for fairness in the process.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 31 Oct 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 22 Apr 2014 12:17:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=192093" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (11) TMI 736 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=218721</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal for condonation of delay, considering the circumstances surrounding the non-receipt of the impugned order. The requirement of pre-deposit was waived, and the matter was remanded for fresh adjudication due to the ex parte nature of the original order. The appellant was granted an opportunity to present their case before the adjudicating authority, emphasizing the need for fairness in the process.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 31 Oct 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=218721</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>