<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (11) TMI 719 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=218704</link>
    <description>The High Court set aside the Tribunal&#039;s decision and remanded the case for further consideration. The Court emphasized the importance of properly assessing whether the investments in mutual funds were part of the business or an adventure in the nature of trade. It highlighted the need for a thorough investigation before disallowing claims based on tax avoidance. The matter was sent back to the Tribunal for a fresh determination without any costs incurred by either party.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 08 Oct 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 28 Jun 2013 11:49:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=192076" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (11) TMI 719 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=218704</link>
      <description>The High Court set aside the Tribunal&#039;s decision and remanded the case for further consideration. The Court emphasized the importance of properly assessing whether the investments in mutual funds were part of the business or an adventure in the nature of trade. It highlighted the need for a thorough investigation before disallowing claims based on tax avoidance. The matter was sent back to the Tribunal for a fresh determination without any costs incurred by either party.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 08 Oct 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=218704</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>