<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (11) TMI 679 - ITAT COCHIN</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=218664</link>
    <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the taxpayer, holding that the notice served under section 143(2) was invalid as it exceeded the statutory time limit. The Tribunal determined that the date of filing should be considered as the date of electronic uploading, regardless of the subsequent dispatch of the ITR-V form within the prescribed time. The Tribunal emphasized that the extended time limit for filing the ITR-V form validated the taxpayer&#039;s return, and the date of filing related back to the electronic uploading date. Consequently, the assessment order was quashed, and the taxpayer&#039;s appeal was allowed while dismissing the revenue&#039;s appeal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 16 Nov 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 27 May 2013 18:35:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=192036" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (11) TMI 679 - ITAT COCHIN</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=218664</link>
      <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the taxpayer, holding that the notice served under section 143(2) was invalid as it exceeded the statutory time limit. The Tribunal determined that the date of filing should be considered as the date of electronic uploading, regardless of the subsequent dispatch of the ITR-V form within the prescribed time. The Tribunal emphasized that the extended time limit for filing the ITR-V form validated the taxpayer&#039;s return, and the date of filing related back to the electronic uploading date. Consequently, the assessment order was quashed, and the taxpayer&#039;s appeal was allowed while dismissing the revenue&#039;s appeal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 16 Nov 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=218664</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>