<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (11) TMI 667 - JHARKHAND HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=218652</link>
    <description>The High Court set aside the Tribunal&#039;s order and remanded the matter back to the Assessing Officer for both issues discussed in the appeal. The court ruled in favor of the appellant, determining that taxing the same amount in two different hands raised a legal question and directing a remand for a fresh order considering all relevant factors in the deletion of an addition of Rs. 23,74,842 by the C.I.T. (Appeal).</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 27 Jul 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 22 Nov 2012 08:58:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=192024" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (11) TMI 667 - JHARKHAND HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=218652</link>
      <description>The High Court set aside the Tribunal&#039;s order and remanded the matter back to the Assessing Officer for both issues discussed in the appeal. The court ruled in favor of the appellant, determining that taxing the same amount in two different hands raised a legal question and directing a remand for a fresh order considering all relevant factors in the deletion of an addition of Rs. 23,74,842 by the C.I.T. (Appeal).</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 27 Jul 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=218652</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>