<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (11) TMI 664 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=218649</link>
    <description>The judgment focused on the interpretation of amended provisions of section 143(2) of the Income Tax Act, the validity of a notice issued under section 143(2) beyond the prescribed time limit, and the application of a retrospective amendment in section 148 for reassessment proceedings. The court found that the Tribunal erred in not considering the retrospective amendments and directed a re-examination of the relevant dates concerning the issuance of notices under section 148. The judgment emphasized the importance of applying the correct law for a just decision within the legal framework, ultimately allowing the Revenue&#039;s miscellaneous application for further review.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 19 Jan 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 22 Nov 2012 08:34:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=192021" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (11) TMI 664 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=218649</link>
      <description>The judgment focused on the interpretation of amended provisions of section 143(2) of the Income Tax Act, the validity of a notice issued under section 143(2) beyond the prescribed time limit, and the application of a retrospective amendment in section 148 for reassessment proceedings. The court found that the Tribunal erred in not considering the retrospective amendments and directed a re-examination of the relevant dates concerning the issuance of notices under section 148. The judgment emphasized the importance of applying the correct law for a just decision within the legal framework, ultimately allowing the Revenue&#039;s miscellaneous application for further review.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 19 Jan 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=218649</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>