<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (11) TMI 649 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=218634</link>
    <description>The court did not grant the mandamus sought by the petitioner but allowed an opportunity to address the issues raised in the rejection letter by submitting relevant records. Compliance with procedural requirements under the Customs Act and relevant rules for duty drawback claims was emphasized. The petitioner was directed to provide necessary records for the authority to reconsider the claim in accordance with the law.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 05 Nov 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 21 Nov 2012 09:25:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=192006" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (11) TMI 649 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=218634</link>
      <description>The court did not grant the mandamus sought by the petitioner but allowed an opportunity to address the issues raised in the rejection letter by submitting relevant records. Compliance with procedural requirements under the Customs Act and relevant rules for duty drawback claims was emphasized. The petitioner was directed to provide necessary records for the authority to reconsider the claim in accordance with the law.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 05 Nov 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=218634</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>